Why Xamarin is the best for Cross-Platform App Development?

Drag to rearrange sections
Rich Text Content

Mobile applications are no longer a preference but a requirement for enterprises. However, the original challenge is in determining native vs. cross-platform apps. With both having its benefits and limitations, choosing the most beneficial is always challenging. Ere we get to why we hold that way, let’s explain why you may prefer cross-platform apps willingly of native apps. If you are planning on an app for your company, here are some reasons to think cross-platform over native.

Before we get to why we deem that way, let’s explain why you may prefer a cross-platform app development instead of native apps. If you are projecting on an app for your business, here are some causes to develop cross-platform over native.

  • Open-source platform
  • Native-like user experience
  • Can reuse the same API
  • Shared app logics
  • Advantages of C#

Companies, start-ups and enterprises looking for more advanced and powerful and less complex applications and, they found Xamarin is the best platform for their unique needs. As a developer, what do you scan for in the platform? Here are some of the key advantages for developers using Xamarin.

Mild and comfortable:

  • The development methods timeline with Xamarin is comparably more succinct. It allows an approximately obvious way of sharing codes beyond multiple mobile platforms and thereby germinates less time to develop an app.
  • Apps developed with Xamarin present a more satisfying experience to the users because of the regulated UI dashboards.
  • Xamarin utilizes C# and the .NET framework -a proven, stable developing environment – for every mobile platform.
  • A group of existing open-source and in-house reference code designs can be reused in Xamarin.iOS or Xamarin. Android designs acknowledge to the C# and .NET framework alliance.

Plasticity:

  • Xamarin is fundamentally developed on open-source technologies allowing you the adaptability to choose segments according to your necessities.
  • The segment storehouse of Xamarin offers a magnificent value-add that presents various resources for developers, including cross-platform libraries, UI controls, and third-party web services.

Performance:

  • Xamarin’s performance is close to native. Apps developed on Xamarin. Andriod or Xamarin.iOS reflect native as the development is concentrated on bestowing business logic rather than codebase.
  • The cross-platform abilities use native UI dashboards and acquire platform-specific hardware expedition, which enables in accomplishing close-to-native performance.

Support:

  • Under utilizing shared code, Xamarin transmits more sporadic bugs to deal with. With Xamarin TestCloud, developers can inquire about apps with fragmentation, CI, and object-based UI testing.
  • Xamarin appears with extensive combination with Azure Cloud, and hence appears with a robust app development environment and supports developers produce rich mobile apps.

Security:

  • Working with Xamarin and Azure, you can be confirmed of the app and data safety. As the relationships between different app segments are treated on the Azure cloud and are encrypted, your app is safe.
  • The secure the association within your app and the backend Azure appears with HTTP certificates and 24-hour warning management protection versus malware.

Flutter vs Xamarin in the field of Cross-platform development:

Flutter

  • Initial Release: 2017
  • User Interface: Native Component
  • Stateful hot reloading: Yes
  • App Preferences: It’s better because it has access to device core functionalities.
  • Framework maturity: Higher at 60fps animation standard. 
  • Language: Dart
  • Industry Adoption: Lower because it’s fairly new in this industry.
  • Configuration and setup: More straightforward
  • Tooling: Higher compatibility with IntelliJ idea, Visual code studio, and Android Studio.
  • Lifecycle Management: No tools to save the application state.
  • Code Structure: Separation between templates, styling, and data in the file.
  • Documentation: Cleaner and easier to follow
  • Speed: Slower

Xamarin:

  • Initial Release: 2011 
  • User Interface: Proprietary Widget
  • Stateful hot reloading: Yes
  • App Preferences: Lesser because it uses the C# bridge for initiating interaction.
  • Framework maturity: Higher as the framework is three years old.
  • Language: C#
  • Industry Adoption: Higher because it’s an industry veteran.
  • Configuration and setup: Lacks streamlined setup and configuration.
  • Tooling: Greater range of IDEs.
  • Lifecycle Management: Better at simplifying the application lifecycle.
  • Code Structure: Management and optimization.
  • Documentation: Is direct since it uses C#.
  • Speed: Faster

These are amazing facts on why enterprises are concentrating on emerging applications on the Xamarin platform.

rich_text    
Drag to rearrange sections
Rich Text Content
rich_text    

Page Comments